|
Lecturer
BIO :Ian Shapiro,
Ph.D., Yale University, 1983, J.D., Yale Law School,
1987, is William R. Kenan, Jr., Professor of Political
Science and Chairman of the Department. He is
a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
and the Carnegie Corporation of New York, and
has been a Fellow at the Guggenheim Foundation,
the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral
Sciences, and the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship
Foundation. He has held visiting appointments
at the University of Cape Town and Nuffield College,
Oxford. His research interests include the methodologies
of the social sciences, theories of justice and
democracy, and the emergence and evolution of
democracy in the post-communist world and sub-Saharan
Africa. He is author of Democratic Justice (Yale
University Press, 1999), Democracys Place
(Cornell University Press, 1996) Pathologies of
Rational Choice Theory, with D. Green (Yale University
Press, 1994), and Political Criticism (University
of California Press, 1990). His next book, Democracy
and Distribution will be published by Princeton
University Press.
|
|
This
lecture addresses two questions: why has American
democracy done so little to improve the condition
of the poor and near poor, and what can be done
about it? These questions are motivated by a practical
concern and a theoretical conundrum. The practical
concern is the persistence of comparatively high
proportions of the population living in or close
to poverty, and the widening income gap between
them and better-off Americans. The theoretical
conundrum is that this state of affairs is surprising,
given standard expectations about the effects
of democracy on distribution. Nineteenth century
elites who resisted expansion of the franchise
and socialists who endorsed the parliamentary
road to socialism agreed that if majority
rule is imposed on a massively unequal status
quo, then most voters would favor taxing the rich
and transferring the proceeds downward. This was
formalized in political science via the median
voter theorem. It predicts majority support for
downward redistribution, given a distributive
status-quo like that in the advanced capitalist
democracies. In the lecture I explore a number
of reasons why the theorem does not hold in practice,
and discuss the implications for democratic reforms
that might improve the absolute relative and absolute
condition of those in the bottom quintile of the
population.
Copyright
© 2001,
Ian
Shapiro
|