24. Indecency

A. The CDA

  1. Computer Decency Act, Krattenmaker 1996 Supp., pp. A-39-A-43

  2. Sable Communications v. FCC and Notes, Krattenmaker, pp. 587-596 (review)
  3. Shea v. Reno, Supp., pp. 846-883 ACLU v. Reno, Krattenmaker 1996 Supp., pp. 77-132

B. Blocking Schemes

  1. Smut Blocker, Supp., pp. 884

  2. Wasserman, Naked debate over shielding kids, Supp., pp. 885-887
  3. Atwood, Going beyond blocking, Supp., pp. 888-895
  4. Retkwa, Safe Computing, Supp., pp. 896-903
  5. Support Grows for Independent Ratings, Supp., pp. 904-905
  6. PICS: Internet Access Controls Without Censorship
  7. Weinberg, Rating the Net

C. State Regulatory Responses

  1. New York Ch. 600, S. 210-E (with legislative history) Supp., pp. 906-913

  2. Goetz, Gag Rules: A State Law Targets Pedophiles-- and Speech-- In Cyberspace, Supp., pp. 914-915

D. Blocking Net Access From State Owned Property

  1. Loving v. Boren