
| Coping With a Deadly Legacy |
BY CHAD GOLDER and VANESSA MARVIN |
| The nations of the world are beginning to realize that land mines are more trouble than they are worth. In December, many nations will gather in Ottawa to ban the production, sale, and use of anti-personnel land mines. The United States, however, is not planning on joining them. |
A child is playing with his friends in an abandoned field. He doesn't know that this field was once a battleground for a war that was fought before he was even born. Suddenly, a blast rips apart the stillness.
Without knowing it, he has stepped on a buried anti-personnel mine. The
explosion tears through his leg; pieces of his shoe, bone chips, and stones
are driven upwards into the tissue of his leg, buttock, genitals, arms and
even his eyes. He is lucky it is only a small mine, a larger one would have
killed him instantly. Still, his chance of survival is slim. If he gets
to a hospital with the proper facilities in time, the doctors may be able
to keep him alive but the messy and complicated damage caused by land mines
is difficult even for the most well-trained war surgeons. Even if he survives,
his future is bleak.
A scene like this one occurs 500 times a week, 2000 times a month. Every
22 minutes, a landmine explodes somewhere in the world. Most of the victims
are innocent civilians. The child may have survived the initial blast but
there is only a 15 percent chance that he will receive proper medical treatment.
His family will be expected to pay over $3,000 in medical expenses, an outrageous
sum for a family with a monthly income of $10-15. The means to obtain an
artificial limb are non-existent. Getting a matching pair of second-hand
crutches is equally difficult. Furthermore, he is left with the social,
psychological, and economic implications of being an amputee in a country
that relies heavily on physical labor.
Many weapons have been banned internationally because of the atrocities of their actions. Poison gas used in World War I was banned because of its horrible effects, and in 1996 the blinding laser was also banned. Many feel that land mines, which are designed to maim and kill by blasting their victims limbs, also deserve to be added to this list. The 1997 Nobel Peace Prize winner Jody Williams, Coordinator of the International Campaign to Ban Land Mines, and many others within the coalition have worked tirelessly to raise the world's awareness of the problems associated with land mines. Williams' involvement began in 1991 when she was hired by the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation. On behalf of the Foundation, Williams and her co-workers began to build up support and membership for the creation of a coalition and the realization of its goals. Now, the Campaign has become one of the most prominent anti-landmines groups in the US. The Supreme Cambodian Patriarch, the Venerable Samdech Maha Ghosananda,
has also gained worldwide recognition for his advocacy of a comprehensive
ban on land mines. The monk's visit to Yale University last year, when he
spoke about the dangers of landmines, inspired Yale student Rita Pin to
organize the Connecticut Conference to Abolish Land Mines. The conference
was held on October 18-19, 1997 at Yale University. This gathering was intended
to "make links between experts, lay people, students, and people affected
by mines." It attempted to increase public awareness of the land mines
issue and explored the ways in which individuals and groups can work together
to end the use of land mines around the world. Speakers included a victim
of a land |
The efforts of the anti-land-mine activists resulted in the Ottawa Treaty Signing Conference. The Conference will be held in December of this year. Over 100 nations, including Russia, France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom, will meet in Ottawa to sign the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpilling, Production, and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Land Mines by the year 2000. A key player in the international community, however, is missing from the list. During the treaty negotiations in September, US representatives announced that they would only agree to the ban on the condition that there would be a geographic exception to the ban. The US wants to continue using land mines against North Korea but the other nations held tight to the comprehensive ban, pointing out that other nations would want to start making geographic exceptions. In addition, the US wanted exceptions for certain kinds of mines and mine systems, as well as a delay in the target date of the ban. Again, the rest of the international community insisted on a comprehensive ban and refused to produce a treaty with loopholes just for the benefit of the US.
|
President Clinton at first said that he would support the ban but withdrew
his support for this treaty under the pressure of the US military. Since
then, numerous members of the military have tried to convince Clinton to
agree to the ban. In a public letter to President Clinton, Lewis Sorely,
one of the speakers at the Connecticut Conference, and many former heads
of the US military, urged President Clinton to ban land mines because it
would be "not only humane, but also militarily responsible. Given the
wide range of weaponry available today, anti-personnel land mines are not
essential. Thus banning them would not undermine the effectiveness or safety
of our forces, nor those of other nations."
Paul Singer, a victim of land mines, pointed out at the Connecticut Conference,
"If land mines were all over the US, like they are in the Third World,
Clinton would be the first one to sign it." Why shouldn't everyone
have the right to live with the security of freedom from land mines? The
atrocity of land mines seems obvious to everyone but the Clinton administration.
There is still time for President Clinton to take a long hard look
at why its policies were rejected by the nations in Oslo and come clean
to the rest of the world," said Mary Wareham, Vietnam Veterans of America
Foundation and Coordinator of the US Campaign to Ban Landmines. "He
can show true leadership by banning this weapon domestically and joining
100-plus nations, in Ottawa, Canada this December for the signing of the
comprehensive ban treaty." For now, the international community is
leaving the US behind in its endeavor to make the world land mine free.
Sources: 2.Winslow, Philip C. The Harvest of Mines. World View, Vol. 10, No.3, Summer 1997, pp.29-34. |
![]() |
Vanessa Marvin, PC00, and Chad Golder, BK01, are students at Yale College.