|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ethnology and
Ethnography in Anthropology (Level III)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keep
in mind that these topics should be broadly interpreted, i.e.
discussions of marriage lead us into questions regarding post-marital
residence rules, desirable number of spouses, possible kinship tie with
spouse, wedding rituals, etc. As a group, you should decide whether you
want to develop a narrow or a broad focus for your topic in light of the
material that you find in doing your research.
*Step Four: On Nov. 12, turn in a copy of your DRAFT paper to me.
Provide a copy of your draft paper for each member of your group. Read
your colleagues' papers and be prepared to provide feedback. As a group,
meet with a Macalester Center for Academic Excellence tutor to discuss
the papers and generate ideas for the cross-cultural group presentation.
Revise draft papers using peers' and tutor's feedback. (Failure to turn
in the draft on time will result in a substantial deduction of points
from your final assignment grade.)
--The Final Draft of your paper will be evaluated on the basis of
substance, effective paper development, and good writing mechanics.
*Step Five: On Fri., Dec. 7, turn in your FINAL DRAFT HRAF
individual paper.
*Step Six: On Dec. 10, 12, and 14 your group will present a 25
min. cross-cultural analysis of your topic. How is sickness viewed
across the cultures that your group investigated? Are there
commonalities across cultures? How does diversity manifest itself, and
what are the possible linkages to other aspects of social organization?
Each member of the group should participate actively. Your peers and the
instructor will evaluate the presentation according to the following
criteria: Organization/effectiveness of the presentation, cross cultural
analysis of topic, and originality/insight of the presentation. Feel
free to be creative and have fun with the presentations. Groups in the
past have played ethnographic jeopardy, hosted talk shows, and run
public debates to get their message across. You are only limited by your
imagination.
Below is a link to a list of the societies grouped by geographic region from which
you may select your specific study population. Again, keep in mind that
you may need to explore available resources before finalizing your
selection.
| Citing eHRAF documents: You should include a standard bibliographic reference for the material, i.e. Appadurai, Arjun 1996 Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Don't forget to include page numbers when citing material in the text! You should also include the basic retrieval statement for an on-line database: Retrieved [month day, year,] from [source] on-line database ([name of database], [item no.--if applicable]). Cultural Anthropology (ANTH 11-03): Peer Evaluation Form Name of Group/Presentation Topic: (CIRCLE ONE): DEATH-Dec. 10, MARRIAGE-Dec. 12, GENDER--Dec. 12 SEX-Dec. 14 EDUCATION/SOCIALIZATION--Dec. 14 Please evaluate this group's presentation according to the following criteria: 1. Organization/effectiveness Did the presentation communicate a clear message? Did the group organize the material in a way that was easy to follow? Was it an effective presentation (organized, compelling, polished)? Did all members participate actively? |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| (poor) | (excellent) |
| 2.Cross-Cultural Analysis Was it apparent that the group had critically analyzed the material presented? Did the group understand the material well enough to push the analysis to it fullest potential? Did they effectively cover all the salient points? |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| (poor) | (excellent) |
| 3. Originality/insight Did it enhance your understanding of the topic presented? Did it challenge you to think in new ways? |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| You may make additional comments: |
written by: Dianna J. Shandy, Department of Anthropology, Macalester College, Saint Paul, MN.