David M. Post

Bio | Research | Pubs | Lab Members | Prospective Students

My research applies empirical and theoretical methods, typically within a food-web framework, to answer questions at the interface of population, community, and ecosystem ecology. I primarily work in aquatic ecosystems, but I also study interactions and processes that link aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Major research areas include:

    1) Food web structure and dynamics
    2) Influence of population dynamics on community structure and ecosystem processes
    3) Landscape linkages
    4) Stable isotope techniques

I address questions in these areas of research by melding theory with empirical studies using field observations, experimentation, and modeling. My research reflects my belief that integration is the strength of ecology and that we must address questions at the appropriate scale, not the convenient scale. Because of this belief, much of my work has been and will remain collaborative, drawing upon diverse disciplines to answer both applied and basic research questions.


Food web structure and dynamics

Food web structure

Food-chain length is an important characteristic of ecological communities because it influences community structure, ecosystem function, and contaminant concentrations in many top predators. Conventional wisdom typically holds that resource availability determines food-chain length. This argument proposes that, because a diminishing amount of energy reaches upper trophic levels, food-chain length should increase with an increase in the amount of energy or limiting resources available to top predators. This idea is typically tested by looking for relationships between primary productivity and food-chain length (although as others have noted, variation in ecological efficiencies could be just as important as variation in primary productivity). These energetic based arguments were recently re-formulated by Thomas Schoener as the productive-space hypothesis, which predicts that food-chain length should increase with the product of ecosystem size (area or volume) and some measure of per-unit-size productivity (e.g., g C m-2 yr-1). The productive-space hypothesis can be tested by looking for a relationship between the productive space (size * productivity) and food-chain length; however, a significant relationship between these two productive space and food-chain length tells us little about the underlying determinants of food-chain length. Alternatively, we can independently consider the effects of ecosystem size and per-unit-size productivity on food-chain length, which provides a better understanding of the potential underlying determinants of food-chain length.

The three testable predictions that arise from independent consideration of ecosystem size and per-unit-size productivity are that food-chain length could be determined by 1) productivity alone (the productivity hypothesis), 2) by ecosystem size alone (the ecosystem-size hypothesis), or 3) by a combination of productivity and ecosystem size (the productive-space hypothesis). The productivity and productive-space hypotheses both derive from the original resource availability arguments; however, the productivity hypothesis does not explicitly include ecosystem size as a determinant of resource availability. The ecosystem-size hypothesis is based on the relationship between ecosystem size and species diversity or between ecosystem size and habitat availability and heterogeneity. The ecosystem-size hypothesis does not explicitly include resource availability as a direct determinant of food-chain length, although resource availability could indirectly contribute to variation in food-chain length.

There have been few empirical tests of these food-chain theories primarily because it is difficult to estimate both ecosystem size and food-chain length in natural ecosystem. Working in collaboration with Mike Pace (Institute of Ecosystem Studies) and Nelson Hairston, Jr. (Cornell Univeristy), we overcame these obstacles by using stable isotope techniques to determine food-chain length and by taking advantage of the relative isolation of lakes to estimate ecosystem size. We estimated food-chain length in 25 north temperate lakes ranging across independent gradients of volume (3.8x105 to 1.7x1012 m3) and per-unit-size productivity (measured using total phosphorus concentrations; 2.6 to 230 μg P l-1). We found that food-chain length increased with ecosystem size, but was not influenced by productivity. The increase in food-chain length was caused by both the addition of new top predators to the food web and a general increase in the trophic position of all top predators. These results challenge the conventional wisdom that energy or resource availability limits food-chain length, and identifies a new direction for research in this area of community ecology.

Currently I am working to better understand how ecosystem size, independent of an effect on totally productivity, may influence food-chain length. I also continue to explore broadly the determinants of food-chain length in different aquatic and terrestrial systems, and to evaluate and critique the varied methods used to describing food-web structure.



 

Relevant publications:

Post, D.M., M.L. Pace, and N.G. Hairston Jr.  2000.  Ecosystem size determines food-chain length in lakes.  Nature 405:1047-1049.     [Abstract; link to Full article]

Post, D.M. The long and short of food-chain length. 2002 Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:269-277    [Abstract; Link to Full article]

Post, D.M. Relationship between food-chain length and attributes of ecosystem size.  In Prep




Relevant publication:

Post, D.M., M.E. Conners, and D.S. Goldberg.  2000.  Prey preference by a top predator and the stability of linked food chains.  Ecology  81:8-14.     [Abstract; link to Full article]

top



Influence of population dynamics on community structure and ecosystem processes

The population dynamics of top predators have important impacts on food web dynamics, community structure, and ecosystem processes. For example, piscivorous fish can have large impacts on food web structure and primary productivity in lakes. Most piscivorous fish, however, begin life as zooplanktivores. Theory predicts that a large cohort of ultimately piscivorous fish (e.g., largemouth bass) can strongly influence pelagic community structure, first through zooplanktivory and then through piscivory as the cohort progresses through its trophic ontogeny. This hypothesis has implications both for understanding natural variation in the food web structure of unexploited ecosystems, and for using piscivorous fish manipulations to influence water quality through food web biomanipulation. My work with largemouth bass confirms theoretical predictions that piscivorous fish can affect food web structure at multiple temporal scales; however, it also shows that direct effects of ultimately piscivorous fish on zooplankton community structure are short-lived because largemouth bass move rapidly from feeding on zooplankton to feeding on benthic invertebrates and fish. I have also worked to combine long-term population data and with short-term mechanistic observations to evaluate mechanisms influencing recruitment of largemouth bass through multiple life history stages. By working within a single system, at multiple temporal scales, I was able to clearly document both the causes of variable recruitment and the linkages between population dynamics and food web structure.



 

Relevant publications:

Post, D.M., J.F. Kitchell, and J.R. Hodgson.  1998.  Interactions among adult demography, spawning date, growth rate, predation, overwinter mortality, and the recruitment of largemouth bass in a northern lake.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:2588-2600.      [Abstract; link to Full article]

Post, D.M., S.R. Carpenter, D.L. Christensen, K.L. Cottingham, J.F. Kitchell, D.E. Schindler, and J.R. Hodgson.  1997.  Seasonal effects of variable recruitment of a dominant piscivore on pelagic food web structure.  Limnology and Oceanography 42:722-729.     [Abstract]

Post, D.M., and J.F. Kitchell.  1997.  Trophic ontogeny and life history effects on interactions between age-0 fishes and zooplankton.  Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Advances in Limnology 49:1-12. [Abstract]

Johnson, J.M. and D.M. Post.  1996.  Morphological constraints on intra-cohort cannibalism in age-0 largemouth bass.  Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:809-812.   [Abstract]

top



Landscape linkages

There is broad interest in better understanding the importance of landscape linkages among what were once thought to be isolated ecosystems. Some of the most interesting questions relate to linkages between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, within aquatic systems such as littora pelagic linkages, and among aquatic systems such as lakes, rivers, and estuaries. Landscape location and arrangement, and their interaction with ecosystem size, may have important impacts on the strength linkages among ecosystems and food webs.

In collaboration with researchers at the University of Wisconsin - Madison and the US Fish & Wildlife, I studied the role of migratory waterfowl in moving nutrients across the landscape of central New Mexico. Birds are highly mobile vectors for nutrients. We found that over-wintering snow geese and sandhill cranes transport nutrients from farm fields, where they feed, to their roosting sites in managed wetlands at the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge. Nutrient inputs into these wetlands both augment nutrient availability and change nutrient cycling through modification of nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratios (bird excretion has low N:P). Although loading was extremely high in the few wetlands where the majority of geese roost (about half of the total annual nutrient load for those wetlands), the impacts were diluted at the larger spatial scale of the entire wetland complex where bird born nutrient had little effect on ambient nutrient concentrations. This project was especially germane in the Southwest where water quantity and quality, and the use of water by humans and wildlife, are in potential conflict. High nutrient inputs by birds exacerbate conservation and management problems associated with high bird densities and limited water supply.

I have also worked to understand how food webs dynamics may be influenced by the movement of predators or the flow of energy and nutrients across ecosystem and sub-ecosystem boundaries. Using theoretical models, I have addressed how food web linkages created by mobile top predators may influence dynamical properties of food webs. I am currently working on a proposal to convene a NCEAS working group to address linkages primarily among aquatic systems, and over the next few years I hope to develop an whole ecosystem experimental program to explore ecosystem and food web linkages among lentic (flowing water; e.g., rivers and streams) and lotic ecosystems (standing water; e.g., lakes).



 

Relevant publications:

Post, D.M., M.E. Conners, and D.S. Goldberg.  2000.  Prey preference by a top predator and the stability of linked food chains.  Ecology   81:8-14.     [ Abstract; link to Full article]

Kitchell, J.F., D.E. Schindler, B.R. Herwig, D.M. Post, M.H. Olson, and M. Oldham. 1999.  Nutrient cycling at the landscape scale: the role of diel foraging migrations by geese at the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico. Limnology and Oceanography 44:828-836.     [Abstract]

Post, D.M., J.P. Taylor, J.F. Kitchell, M.H. Olson, D.E. Schindler, and B.R. Herwig.  1998.  The role of migratory waterfowl as nutrient vectors in managed wetlands.  Conservation Biology 12:910-920.     [Abstract]


top



Stable Isotope Techniques

My research on food-chain length was made possible by recent advances in stable isotope analysis. In addition to using stable isotopes to document food web structure, I am using stable isotope techniques to evaluate the flux of carbon into and throuh lake food webs. I hope to expand this work in the future by including radiocarbon (14C) to better resolve carbon sources. My lab at Yale will be an active partner in the new Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies, Center for Stable Isotopic Studies of the Environment. Over the next few yaers I plan to develop and apply compound specific stable isotope techniques to help better resolve food web structure in an effort to critically test a number of basic questions in food web ecology. The following paper is my attempt to document the models, methods, and assumptions required to estimate trophic position using stable isotopes



 

Relevant publication:

Post,D.M.   2002.  Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703-718.     [Abstract; link to Full article]



top

 

People | Undergraduate Program | Graduate Program | Resources | Business Office  | Contact Us | Home

Copyright © 2003 Yale University. All Rights Reserved.
Site Design Academic Web Pages