Select initial vigorForest dynamics of the northern hardwood forest
at Hubbard Brook, New HampshireBased on 5 biennial assessments of 5934 uniquely identified trees on the 10 hectares "Bird Lines" over the 10 year period from 1991 to 2001
Select a species?
Select a year?
The "average" is not yet working and we are thinking whether or not it useful because there is clearly some directional changes going on in this forest which may be studied only by making biennnial comparisons.Enter lower diameter (in cm):You may select a diameter range over which you would like to make the summaries. This will super cede any decision you may have made above for size class. The smallest diameter included in the data is 10 cm and there are no trees over 120 cm dbh.
(See notes below on how to use this program to calculate mortality rates)(What are "Bird Lines"? - Long (~ 2.5 km) forest inventory transecs in the central valley at Hubbard Brook in an area used for decades by the "Bird People" to study birds in the Northern Hardwood forest. The usage "Bird Lines" has meaning to the Hubbard Brook scientific community and we have preserved the notation as the identification for this forest inventory data set.)
The diagram below illustrates the types of information which can be extracted with this program. The forest plots with tagged trees were set up in 1991. Each tree was uniquely identified on 396 plots each 25 meters long and 10 meters wide. The plots were on continuous contiguous transects in the central part of the Hubbard Brook valley in a general area called the Bird Area - because it is the area in which long term studies of bird populations is taking place. The dbh and species of each tagged tree was taken in 1991 and each tree was accessed in one of 4 states of vigor - healthy, sick, dead tree and snag. In 1993, 1995, 1997, 1999 and 2001 each tree was revisited and its current state of vigor again checked. Dbhes were not obtained in the two year intervals until 2001 when all trees were again dbhed. From 1993 on two more categories of vigor were added - trees which had fallen to the ground dead and new trees in-growing at the 10 cm minimum starting diameter of the study.
From this data the program allows the determination of the changes in the vigor of all the trees between each of the sampling intervals. The program asks for the starting vigor you would like to have analysed- such as asking what is the fate of all the live trees in 1991 by the year 1993. The results of this are illustrated in the accompanying diagram. There were 4649 live healthy trees in 1991 (code 0) and the arrows with the numbers show the numbers of these trees which continued as live healthy trees, which became sick trees, which died and were standing dead trees in 1993, which had broken off (died) and became snags or had fallen to the ground dead. So if you run the program for the options of live trees to start, then all species, then the starting year you should get the answers shown in the figure. If you chose dead trees to start for the same all species and starting in 1991 you would get the fates of those trees in the ensuing 2 year interval - in 1993. This may be done for any of the 5 two year intervals for any species. If you do not select a specific diameter range over which to make the summaries, all the trees are used.When running years after 1991 the program also gives you the number of in-growth trees which were added because they reached 10 cm dbh during the two years period. When running the 1991 starting year the program also gives you the average radial growth in mm of the selected species or for all trees. Since we only measured the trees in 1991 and again in 2001 there is really only one set of "growth". The radial growth increment is the average growth of all the trees obtained by subtracting the initial diameter from the final diameter and making the necessary conversions to radial growth in mm. There are a number of odds and ends with this which will be added as the fine print below.
The data file looks like the illustration above. The data are:5 1 25.0 0 5 ACSP 0 1 10.7 0 0 0 3 -1 -1 0.0
5 1 25.0 0 2 FAGR 0 0 29.4 5 5 5 5 5 -1 0.0
5 1 25.0 0 2 FAGR 0 0 22.8 4 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0.0
5 1 25.0 0 6 ACPE 0 2 13.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0
5 2 25.0 290 2 FAGR 0 3 39.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 45.7
5 2 25.0 290 2 FAGR 0 4 19.2 0 0 0 3 0 0 23.0
5 2 25.0 290 2 FAGR 0 7 10.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0
5 2 25.0 290 2 FAGR 0 8 12.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5
5 2 25.0 290 2 FAGR 0 9 13.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3
5 2 25.0 290 2 FAGR 0 10 11.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7
5 2 25.0 290 1 ACSA 0 5 53.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 58.5
5 2 25.0 290 14 TSCA 0 6 47.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 52.9
5 2 25.0 290 13 ACRU 0 0 55.2 5 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0.0
5 2 25.0 290 2 FAGR 0 5501 10.1 7 7 1 0 0 0 10.0
5 2 25.0 290 2 FAGR 0 5801 10.5 7 7 7 7 1 0 10.4
5 3 25.6 270 2 FAGR 0 11 32.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.6
5 3 25.6 270 2 FAGR 0 12 15.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3
5 3 25.6 270 2 FAGR 0 19 13.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6
5 3 25.6 270 4 FRAM 0 13 56.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 60.4
5 3 25.6 270 13 ACRU 0 14 26.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.6
5 3 25.6 270 1 ACSA 0 15 27.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.8
5 - The transect line number. This project was established initially to characterize the forest in which the bird studies were taking place and in so doing has used a pre existing "grid system" set up by the Bird People. This grid system consists of a 50 x 50 m grid laid out by compass and pacing and covers many square km of forest. We selected 4 East-West running lines of this grid system to establish the tree study The Bird Line transects are 50 meters apart and we selected their line #5 as the northerly of the 4 lines we used to establish plots along. See map. We then used lines 9, 13 and 17 each 200 meters apart to the south of the first used line. Thus each set of plots is 25 meters long arranged in a continuous contiguous set of plots along about 2.5 km of line. Each line is essentially a transect through the forest. We call them lines and transects interchangeably here.1 - plot number- note there are only three trees in plot 1 - this is because it crosses and runs along a stream and swale.
25 - length of the plot in meters (plots are 10 meters wide- 5 meters either side of the 25 m long center line. Plot lengths will vary a little. The bird lines were established by compass and pacing and thus the grid is not perfect. We thought it better to have our plots start and end near the grid corners established by the bird people. Sometimes this is a few meters longer or shorter than 25 meters.
0 - this is the compass bearing of the plot- which was not recorded for the first plot, the second plot is 290 degrees. Since the transccts were originally established by compass and pacing over many years and are not perfect, the plot bearings occasionally vary a little from a straight line.
5 - species number
ACSP - the first tree is a Mountain maple - Acer spicatum - see species list below for all the species numbers.
0 - code for multiple stemmed trees - if there were two stems there would be a number 2 for two trees in a row,
if a 4 then 4 trees in a row would have a 4 in this location for 4 stems.
1 - Tree tag number - the first tree, the first tag.
10.7 - dbh in cm in 1991
0 - alive in 1991
0 - alive in 1993
0 - alive in 1995
3 - sick in 1997
-1 - down dead on the ground in 1999
-1 - still and forever dead and down
0.0 - (No dbh taken in 2001. We generally did not take the diameters of down trees.We did not tag dead trees or snags in 1991. These plots were rather small so we could keep track of the one or two dead trees or snags without tagging them. Thus the second tree on the line has no tag number. It has a starting code of 5 which means it was a snag in 1991 and remained a snag until 2001 when it had fallen to the ground dead.
The next tree also without a tag was a standing dead tree (code 4) in 1991 but had fallen to the ground as dead and down tree by 1993 and obviously stayed as such forever.
The forth tree was alive to start as tag #2 and stayed alive for the entire interval - all code 0 (zero). It had a starting dbh of 13.3 in 1991 and in 2002 had a dbh of 16.0 cm.
You will note that some beeches (FAGR) about 15 trees down the list have large tag numbers - these trees were added during the study as they became large enough to add to the inventory (10 cm dbh). There is some tricky coding here- we use a 7 as a place holder for the years before a tree is added to the data set. In this case the first added beech has a 7 in 1991 and 1993 and was added to the population in 1995 with a 1 code. After that it continues as a code 0 or a live tree. The next beech was added in 1999. The diameter at the time it was added to the list appears on the left and the diameter in 2001 appears on the right.
It is not practical to program in mortality rates directly. However they can be calculated from the data when you run Live or Sick trees as the starting vigor. (Clearly irrelevant in relation to already dead trees). So if you run live trees say for 1991 as a starting year - the program gives you the number of live trees which died in three categories- fell to the ground (-1), died standing and remain as standing dead trees (4) or died standing but broke off above dbh (snags) (5). It also gives the total number of starting live trees. It also gives the percent dead in each of these three categories. To get total percent dead you need to add up the total number of trees dying and then make the division with respect to the total number of live trees starting the period - don't forget to divide by two because this mortality is based on two years of time!!!
Very Fine print---
Uniquely identified: Since we did not tag standing dead trees or snags at the start of the project in 1991, we clearly have trees which are not "uniquely" identified. However these are one or two trees on each plot and thus can be easily found and checked at each 2 year inventory interval. Many of these have fallen to the ground over the 10 year period and any trees dying after the being tagged as live are clearly identifiable.
"Missed" trees- In 1993 we found a few trees which we apparently missed in 1991 when we established the study. These trees were added to the study at that time. We even have a few trees like this in succeeding years. If you study the data file itself in detail you will find a 2 as a place holder in the vigor location. These mean that the tree was added not as in-growth, but rather as a tree we think we missed in the preceding years. There are very few of these and when they were added the dbh was decreased by assuming a growth rate of 1 mm per year radial growth,
Definitions of dead trees and snags; Dead trees are trees which are dead burt still alive most of their main branches and even their fine branches. Snags are dead trees broken off above DBH and without major branches. This is usually an easy definition but clearly not a perfect one since the trees progressively loose branches and slowly change from a standing dead tree to a snag. But on the other hand most of the time it is obvious which is the case!
Trees getting smaller: You will find that there are a few live trees which "get smaller" in diameter between 1991 and 2001. This is a fact of field measurement. Trees such as the birches which have loose curly bark which accts like a spring when the dbh tale is pulled around it are the most likely to "get smaller". This is why we don't bother to make the measures every two years - but rather every 10 years. The average growth does not consider this problem but just adds in negative growth- presumable this is offset by those which were larger than the real growth for the same bark reason. We have checked the average growth based on these dbh change measures with 1000's of tree cores from the same area and the answer oe basically the same. So it averages out.
Diameters on down trees not taken- We did not take the diameters of the down trees- basically because we were not sure which the were in some cases and also it was not possible to be very sure of where dbh was on a down tree.
Ingrowth - live (Never sick)??