| OUR JOURNEY |
| MAIN TOPICS |
| WHO'S WHO |
| PHOTO ALBUM |
| ABOUT |
| OUR SPONSORS |
| HOME |
| Home :: Our Journey :: Journal Day 8: Arrival in Bo | ||||||||||||
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 | Day 7 | Day 8 | Day 9 | Day 10 | Day 11 | Day 12 | ||||||||||||
Monday, March 13, 2006 [ Entry by: Mina Alaghband ] | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Mina Alaghband was, during this trip, a sophomore at Yale College, hailing from London, England. She studied History and International Studies with a focus on practical and intellectual approaches to post revolutionary situations. Her academic interests include microfinance, early modern and modern revolution, enlightenment philosophy, constructions of race, corporate social responsibility and post-conflict accountability, notably of local leaders and child combatants. [ minimize ] | ||||||||||||
We arrived in Bo to yet another staff of friendly and committed CARE
workers facing some severe problems. The second largest city in Sierra Leone
with 150,000 people, Bo has particular problems with unemployed youth,
refugees absorbed during the civil conflict, and food shortages. The staff
briefed us on food security and refugee programs that seek to empower Bo
residents and ameliorate prevalent problems.
DORA involves many components: seed and tool distribution, environmental activities to reverse the degradation brought about by refugee settlement, management of swamp rehabilitation, organization of agro forestry land, reduction of malnutrition through educative programs, the building of seed banks and drying floors, and the creation and monitoring of forums in which refugees can approach problems constructively while celebrating peace and rights. Possibly the most interesting part of this project for me, is how productive partnerships with coordination of activities must be formed among different NGOs for optimal success. Where the World Food Program is giving food out in these camps, for example, CARE complements the activity by teaching inhabitants how to preserve food and prepare nutritionally rich meals with their newly donated items. While this coordination is widespread, the mechanisms vary from one site to another: in some, NGOs parcel out different activities according to their specific skills, whereas in others, some NGOs are ancillary to other leading ones, often those sponsored by the United Nations.
The main objective of the third and final project, ProFARM (Promoting Food Access and Community Mobilization), is to contribute to the government’s effort towards food security and good governance by supplying seeds, expanding production capabilities, and training local political and religious leaders in good governance, transparency, and accountability. So far, ProFARM, a relatively new, but quickly expanding project, has set up farmer field schools wherein the Ministry of Agriculture has introduced new techniques. These include encouraging farmers to go to lowlands, creating new market opportunities by finding undersupplied areas for trade, and teaching storage and transaction mechanisms. As with many of CARE's programs, there is also a rights-based element. The first step is highlighting the link between the violation of rights and societal disorder and subsequent negative outcomes. This is achieved through the accounting of rights violations in log books, the celebration of both rights and peace days, and the sponsorship of workshops in which youth and women's rights are discussed in the context of improving the community. The second step facilitates mobilization. CARE motivates communities to become proactive, for example, in building their own roads creating links between local government and the people they serve, and working to integrate youth and women into local decision-making. CARE attempts to increase transparency in a non-confrontational manner so that these first two steps can be implemented without resistance from those who are more powerful in the society. An example of this might be in encouraging dialogues when a chief mismanages community assets. In 2005, several chiefs came together and admitted their mistakes, a huge concession that facilitated an understanding for a need to change and a beginning of increasing transparency. | ||||||||||||
| [ back to top ] |